The use of Apeel, an edible food coating technology, on our food without our consent raises significant concerns about food sovereignty rights.

Food sovereignty encompasses the ability of individuals and communities to make decisions about their food systems, including what is applied to their food.

Here's a closer look at how Apeel's application without consumer input violates these rights:

1. **Lack of Informed Consent**: Applying Apeel coatings to food items without informing consumers or seeking their consent takes away their right to choose what they consume. Consumers have a fundamental right to know what is on their food and have a say in the matter.

2. **Transparency Issues**: The proprietary nature of Apeel's technology and formulations creates a lack of transparency. Without clear information on the composition of the coatings and potential health impacts, consumers are left in the dark about what they are eating and what effects it may have on their health.

3. **Autonomy and Choice**: Food sovereignty is about empowering individuals and communities to make decisions about their food systems. When Apeel is applied without consent, it undermines this autonomy by imposing a technology on consumers without their input or choice.

4. **Cultural Concerns**: Food sovereignty also encompasses cultural practices and traditions related to food. Communities may have culturally specific preferences or values that are not considered when Apeel is applied indiscriminately.

In conclusion, the application of Apeel coatings to food items without consumer input raises significant questions about food sovereignty rights.

In order to uphold food sovereignty, it is essential to ensure transparency, allow for public participation and grant full decision-making power to the people regarding the application of food technologies like Apeel.

September 21, 2023 — stephanie pena
Tags: nutrition